首頁 >
| Criminal Case | Defendant Acquitted of Hit-and-Run After Assisting Victim onto Ambulance

Relevant Legal Provisions
Article 185-4 of the Criminal Code:A driver of a power-driven vehicle who causes an accident resulting in injury and flees the scene shall be punished with imprisonment for not less than six months and not more than five years. If the accident results in death or serious injury, the punishment shall be imprisonment for not less than one year and not more than seven years.
Facts and Reasons
The defendant (our client) was riding a heavy motorcycle and, due to failing to observe traffic conditions, changed lanes and sideswiped another heavy motorcycle traveling in the same direction, causing injury to the passenger. After the accident, the defendant assisted by calling an ambulance and helping at the scene but left afterward.
The prosecutor argued that the defendant left without waiting for the police to arrive or leaving contact information with the injured party, nor did the defendant obtain the victim’s consent to depart. Therefore, the prosecutor believed the defendant had the intent to flee and filed a charge of hit-and-run.
Prosecutor's Disposition
Verdict: Not Guilty.
Upon examination, the court found that after the accident, the defendant called emergency services, stayed until the ambulance arrived, and assisted paramedics in caring for the injured person. The defendant also communicated with the medical responders. Although the defendant did not remain until the police arrived or leave contact information before leaving, these facts were not disputed by either party.
The purpose of Article 185-4 of the Criminal Code is to reduce harm or death to victims. The defendant’s conduct already fulfilled the duties of remaining at the scene and assisting (including arranging for others to assist) the injured person in obtaining medical attention.
Therefore, the defendant's actions did not constitute “flight” under Article 185-4. The court accepted the defense's argument that the defendant lacked intent to flee the scene and rendered a not guilty verdict.
(Note: To protect the client's interests, certain case details and judgment images have been redacted and modified. For a full review of the case, please refer to Judicial Yuan's judgment database)
Attorneys:Vincent Huang、 Herman Lyu、Ian Yan
-
04.07 2026
Civil | Property Returned but Interior Damaged — P...
-
03.24 2026
Criminal | LINE Investment Fraud — Syndicate Buste...
-
03.17 2026
Criminal | Procurement Act Violation — Deferred Pr...
-
03.10 2026
Civil | Breach of Agreement — Favorable Judgment O...
-
03.03 2026
Criminal | Embezzlement & Fraud Case — Non-Prosecu...
-
02.24 2026
Owner Failed to Properly Manage Pet Dog That Bit a...
-
02.10 2026
Divorce | Successfully Won Custody of Minor Childr...
-
02.03 2026
Criminal | Defendant Convicted of Forgery & Fraud ...
-
01.27 2026
Criminal | Business Embezzlement and Breach of Tru...
-
01.20 2026
Traffic Accident | Defendant Negligent Injury Case...
-
01.13 2026
Criminal Sexual Harassment Case Successful Settlem...
-
01.06 2026
Fraud | Defendant Acquitted; Prosecutor Appealed; ...
-
12.30 2025
Child Sexual Exploitation Case | Voluntary Surrend...
-
12.23 2025
Abuse of Litigation by the Opposing Party?! Defend...
-
12.16 2025
Management Committee Sued for Removal of Infringem...