首頁 >
| Spending Money to Buy a House, Only to End Up with an Illegal Construction!
Case Background
Thirty years ago, Mr. De learned of newly built houses on a hillside in a nearby city. The tranquil environment and close proximity to the urban area excited him, so he eagerly purchased a house from the developer, Mr. Yi, and settled there, building a family. However, these houses never obtained a usage permit. Thirty years later, Mr. De's family suddenly received a notice of litigation from the new landowner, demanding that they demolish the house and return the land. It turned out that Mr. Yi, due to massive debts, had mortgaged the land the house was located, and now the land had a new owner. Mr. De's family found themselves in a real estate dispute, and in desperation, they came to our office for help.
Our Practical Experience
What rights did Mr. De purchase without a usage permit for the house?
Given that property ownership in our country is separated into land and buildings, in this case, Mr. De initially only bought the house without buying the land. Without a usage permit, the house is considered an "illegal construction" or "unauthorized building." Due to economic considerations, the Supreme Court has recognized that illegal constructions can be traded, but what is traded is not "ownership" but a right known as "factual disposal rights."
Can the new landowner claim to be the new owner and sue for the demolition of the house and return of the land?
Since Mr. De originally bought the house from Mr. Yi, and Mr. Yi was the landowner, legally, Mr. De had a right to use the land. However, if the landowner changes, whether this right still exists is questionable.
To prevent the demolition of a well-constructed house due to a change in land ownership, which is detrimental to economic development, Article 425-1 of the Civil Code stipulates, "When the land and the building on it belong to the same owner, and the ownership of the land or the building is transferred to another person, or when the land and the building are transferred to different persons simultaneously or successively, it is presumed that there is a lease relationship between the land transferee and the building transferee within the period the building can be used." This provision is also applicable to situations involving factual disposal rights.
In compliance with the legal provisions, even if Mr. Yi transfers the land to another person or it is auctioned off, Mr. De's family might still have a legal right to use the land against the new owner. Whether the conditions are met will require a lawyer to organize and assess the evidence and engage in legal arguments against the new landowner's claims.
[Continue reading:What to Do if Land is Occupied for a Long Time?]
>Consult Now
-
11.25 2025
Criminal | Forgery of Documents, etc. Successfully...
-
11.18 2025
Civil Case | Defendant’s Claim for Damages Success...
-
11.11 2025
Criminal | Violation of Anti-Money Laundering Act,...
-
10.28 2025
Criminal Case | Defendant Acquitted of Hit-and-Run...
-
10.21 2025
Criminal Case | Defendant Charged with Forgery Acq...
-
10.14 2025
Assisted in the Division of Co-owned Property and ...
-
09.30 2025
Defendant – Offenses Against Sexual Autonomy Appea...
-
09.23 2025
Criminal | Defendant Charged with Embezzlement in ...
-
09.16 2025
Criminal | Case of Infringement of Sexual Privacy ...
-
09.09 2025
Request for Ownership Transfer Registration – Plai...
-
09.02 2025
Civil | Joint Construction Dispute Requesting Perf...
-
08.26 2025
Criminal | Defendant Charged with Aggravated Fraud...
-
08.19 2025
Internal Company Dispute Defendant Forged Document...
-
08.12 2025
Civil Case | Check Dishonored – Claim for Loan Rep...
-
08.05 2025
Heavy Motorcycle Rear-End Collision, Lawsuit for N...